2010-01-30

Future Shock

SAN FRANCISCO - JANUARY 27:  Apple Inc. CEO St...Image by Getty Images via Daylife
Fraser Speirs - Blog - Future Shock
What you're seeing in the industry's reaction to the iPad is nothing less than future shock.


For an industry that prides itself on being forward looking, the tech industry does not deal very well with change (or even potential change).  It seems the same pattern repeats itself every time someone attempts some advancement or deviation from "standard" computer.  Rather than consider how things might improve, there is a very conservative concern with any change from the present standard.



For years we've all held to the belief that computing had to be made simpler for the 'average person'. I find it difficult to come to any conclusion other than that we have totally failed in this effort.
I have made a similar argument for years.  Other than computers, there is no mature industry that has failed to evolve to a point of appliance-level ease or use.  How many people would drive their own cars, if they were required to install news "fixes" every few weeks?  Most computers today harken back to the time when every driver had to be an auto mechanic too.


I'm often saddened by the infantilising effect of high technology on adults. From being in control of their world, they're thrust back to a childish, mediaeval world in which gremlins appear to torment them and disappear at will and against which magic, spells, and the local witch doctor are their only refuges.
As one of the "witch doctors", I completely agree with this.  If you take a moment to ignore the way we reached the present, it becomes obvious the current state of affairs is ridiculous.  There is no real reason for the effort and complexity required for "everyday" computer use.  No reason, except that it is easier to populate a bullet list of features than to enable things to work in an elegant and sensible manner.


People talk about Steve Jobs' reality distortion field, and I don't disagree that the man has a quasi-hypnotic ability to convince. There's another reality distortion field at work, though, and everyone that makes a living from the tech industry is within its tractor-beam. That RDF tells us that computers are awesome, they work great and only those too stupid to live can't work them.
For those of us interested in the nuts and bolts, the journey is its own reward.  To people with a job to get done, the "journey" of learning the ins and outs and maintaining a modern computing system is an irrelevant source of frustration, distraction, and loss of productivity.


And how arrogant is it to expect and demand a user become an expert before being allowed in the clubhouse of computers?  Some of us may enjoy the challenges of involved in learning a computer system or program, but it would be foolish to forget that our enjoyment comes from the challenge.  But most people enjoy other types of challenges, and it does not make sense to force them to "enjoy" the challenges that computers provide.


Think of the millions of hours of human effort spent on preventing and recovering from the problems caused by completely open computer systems.
When you really think about it, maintaining configuration files, patches, updates, and security fixes is a huge time sink.  Imagine how much time is simply used by all the administrators, all the users across the world simply maintaining the tools they need for their work or their play.  That is time that cannot be used for work or play and time that can never be returned.


I can only think of one word to describe this situation: a travesty.  Anything that reduces that time sink is a good thing.


In presenting the iPad (and iPhone and iPod touch), Apple is offering a new way to do things.  A way that will allow most people to do most of what they want without the effort and complexity of traditional computer systems.  They are not threatening to take away the old way of doing things.  They are not threatening to take away your configurations files, your registry, or your ability to buy an old-style computer system and download and install whatever you want.


People and pundits have complained about the complete control that Apple has over this platform, but many of them nonetheless believe the device will sell well and might be a huge success.  What does it say about the current state of affairs is users are willing to hand over that level of control to avoid the mess and problems of the traditional less controlled systems?


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

2010-01-22

Apple Tablet/Slate Predictions, Prognostications, and Dreams

Image representing Apple as depicted in CrunchBaseImage via CrunchBase
Introduction
It seems clear that Apple will introduce a tablet or slate device at its recently announced event on January 27.  Since the cat may soon be officially out of the bag, it is a good time to make predictions and see how well we do.

As with any major Apple product announcement, rumors and information of questionable accuracy have been flying around for months.  Some little bit of it is actual leaked data, much of this is educated extrapolation, and quite a bit wishful thinking or outright BS.

So, here's my pass at putting together a set of predictions in advance of the actual announcement.


Publications and Multimedia
Combining the older rumors of the NY Times and the more recent rumors regarding Harper Collins, it seems clear Apple plans to bring electronic books and publications to the iTunes "mall".  They will likely use the same 70/30 split they use for the App Store, and it seems Amazon is worried enough to announce they would use the same pricing scheme.

Amazon has been having some success with e-books, and there has been increased interest in electronic newspapers and comic books.  One problem with the existing framework for e-books is that it has been based on the ancient structure for physical books where traditionally the closer you are to the creative process, the less money you make.  The author normally needs a corporate publisher makes very little, and the publisher guarantees the sale of the physical books by accepting returns for an extended period of time.  The retailer is in a fairly nice position (relatively speaking).  In addition, current e-books are mostly simple text with little or no multimedia features.

I simply cannot imagine Apple introducing a device for e-books that does not support audio, video and other multimedia formats.  I think Apple's new iTunes LP and iTunes Extras are the precursors of a web-technology-based standard format for interactive multimedia content.

If Apple adopts a 70/30 split and accepts content from authors directly, it would be a dramatic improvement for self-publishing allowing authors to go directly to their audience and still have a good chance of reaching a large audience.  In the area of music, Apple has focused on the large labels, but the App Store accepts submissions from anyone.

I believe Apple will go with this 70/30 model for publications as diverse as books, text books, newspapers, magazines, graphic novels, and comic books all including multimedia features based on open HTML 5 type technologies.  I hope they open the door to anyone rather than restricting things to major corporate publishers.


Photograph showing Apple Newton hand held comp...Image via Wikipedia

Games
While I do not think Apple intended the iPhone and iPod Touch to become a primary gaming platform, they have become a gaming juggernaut.  And Apple knows a good thing when they see it.  Any future devices will begin with a well considered gaming strategy and the upcoming tablet is no exception.

I believe everything points towards Apple supporting and encouraging high quality gaming on the new large screen tablet.  The larger screen and significantly better performing hardware will enable a whole different class of games.  With the gaming press invited to the event, this seems to be a lock.


Productivity and Applications
While there is much less fact and only a little rumor to go on, I hope the new tablet device supports more productivity/creativity applications in a manner similar to a regular Mac or PC.  I would love to see iLife, iWork, and some of Apple's "Pro" apps such as Aperture.

To go a bit further out on a limb, I further projects my hopes in the area of file organization.  Apple has organized our Music in a database in iTunes, our photos in the iPhoto or Aperture databases, and they've begun to do the same for our personal videos with iMovie.  By extending this model to traditional productivity files (e.g. PDF's, text, and spreadsheets), Apple could create a useful way to organize virtually all our files and multimedia assets while simplifying the learning curve for novice users and allowing some nice functionality (i.e. "Smart Folders") for more advanced users.  This would allow the new line of devices to replace a laptop our desktop for 90% of most peoples' activities.


Music
Apple largely has music conquered, so I don't expect anything dramatic in this area.  I believe Apple will continue to refine things and emphasize multimedia features like iTunes LP.  I personally hope for a full Cocoa rewrite of iTunes.


Business Model and 30/70
Since the great success of the App Store's 70/30 revenue split, Apple will be looking for new areas to apply this business model.  While Microsoft has been working hard for decades to somehow insert itself into as many transactions as possible, Apple appears to have found a practical way to do it.  Songs, television, movies, apps, books, newspapers, magazines, and comic books.  Apple could be well on their way to extracting a 30% cut from virtually all the media consumers purchase.

This would be very powerful for Apple's bottom line, but it could present problems going forward.  As much as I like Apple, it might be the best idea to depend on one company for so much.  But no other companies seem to be both capable and interested in doing these things.

I think what started as an effort by Apple to protect itself from a media monopoly dominated my Microsoft's proprietary formats may lead to an effective monopoly by Apple.  Fortunately, this type of development will take some time, and Apple has tended to focus on standards-based file formats making completely lock-in a smaller risk than where we seemed to be headed with Microsoft's Windows Media before iTunes hit the scene.


Logistics
It is rumored that Apple's new tablet may be launched for the US only initially and might cost as much as $999 (or maybe even more).  And although I hope neither of these is true, I must admit they seem likely.

One thing I have not seen much discussion about is how Apple maximizes revenue and expectations on new product launches.  Rather than try to introduce a new product across the entire globe priced at its permanent price, Apple tends to introduce and price product in controlled phases.  By reducing the area of introduction, they make it easier to handle the logistics of manufacture, warehousing, and delivery.  And price controlling the supply tightly, they can increase demand thereby supporting a higher unit price initially, when early adopters will buy anyway being relatively insensitive to price.  After the early problems (if any) have been solved, logistics are in place for greater volume, and the early adopting audience has been satisfied (at high prices), Apple's can lower the retail price and drive volume.  Most obviously, they did this by initially keeping the iPod Mac only for a few years, introducing the iPhone in the US only on a single carrier at first.

Combined with the difficulty in secure rights to various media in different countries, it seems logical to expect the tablet will have an initially restricted roll out with a high price point.  After gauging market reaction and adjusting, Apple will introduce the new product in more markets and begin to decrease pricing as scale allows to increase volume and market share/penetration.

So, expect a US launch at a high price. (Edit: I'm setting my estimate at $849 with no subsidy but maybe less if they do a cell deal.)


Expectations
There are so many rumors and hopes surrounding this product that has not been announced and might never exist, there exists the real specter of failing to meet artificially high expectations.  Apple's recent track record adds to the expectation of not just a successful product but a revolution.  Anything short of that may be seen as a failure.

On the other hand, Apple has all the pieces in place to create a 5th major product revelation (after the personal computer {Apple ][} , the GUI {Mac}, personal music device and the music delivery industry (iPod), and the smart phone and applications {iPhone and App Store}).  I'm not sure how many more revolutions Steve Jobs has left in him, and he probably feels the same way.  Because of this, I feel confident he will not release anything less than a spectacular game changer.


Prognostications
I expect a roughly 10 inch LCD tablet running a PA Semi dual-core ARM Cortex 9 chip with the latest Imagination Technologies PowerVR graphics.  I expect 512-1024 MB of RAM with flash storage of 16-64 GB.  I agree with reports that the main system-on-a-chip will put Apple out in the lead in terms of power and efficiency, and we might see a significant breakthrough there.

Software-wise, we'll get version 4 of the mobile OS X supporting this new tablet and the more recent iPhones and iPod Touches.  I hope to see some improvements in on-screen notifications and in multitasking.  I think we will see a major evolution (but not revolution) in the touch-based user interface, and the new device will be focused on finding, purchasing, and accessing media of all types. I hope to see some sort of cloud-based storage and synchronization, because it is past time that Mobile Me matured into a more useful service.

I don't care too much about the specific name, but I would guess it would be one of these (in descending order): Canvas, iBook, Slate, iPad, Tablet, or GeniusPad.  I also would not be surprised to see "Touch" worked into the name to help differentiate the new mobile line of touch-based device from Apple along with the iPhone and iPod Touch.

I still have high expectations and look forward to seeing them exceeded.




Additional Links

Bonus (fake?) Footage




Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

2009-09-11

Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Info and Resources


NEW YORK - JUNE 11:  A female Snow Leopard pre...Image by Getty Images via Daylife
Having been waiting for the Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard release, I'm happy to say I'm running it now with no real problems. I have included some discussion about both the OS and the coverage below. Here, I am mainly focused on features, expectations/perception, and transitions in the new version.




Scope of Update vs. a Service Pack
A number of web pundits are making noise arguing somewhat derisively that Snow Leopard is more of a "service pack" than a full version upgrade. Personally, I'm a bit surprised by this. The underlying improvements are so significant (see below: 64-bit, OpenCL, and Grand Central), that I do not understand this point of view.

In fact, I believe two factors are at play here: 1) Apple is experiencing some backlash, and it has become fashionable to be down on Apple, and 2) Software manufacturers have been correct in including numerous UI changes and features, because that is what these pundits seem to focus on.

Click for more -->

2009-08-12

Google Reader Improvements: A flurry of features for feed readers

A flurry of features for feed readers

I was having trouble with my account in Google Reader today, and now I think I know why. Google has implemented some nice sharing features and improved Reader in numerous smaller ways.

For me, the biggest change is the ability to send posts directly to other services such as Twitter, Blogger, Digg, or FaceBook (among others). This is especially useful now that FaceBook has scooped up FriendFeed, which is the service I have used to ensure my shared items made it out to other services and friends.

Looks pretty good, but it probably still needs a bit of polish. The "Send to" features appears to require a pop-up window, and that seems a bit kludgy in modern times.

Apple Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Available for Pre-order

Amazon has Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) available for pre-order. You can get stand-alone upgrades, family packages, or packages with iLife and iWork. Order up!

















2009-07-31

Serious Shock Threat to Shutdown Skype

Shock threat to shut Skype

Can eBay have really been this foolish? They overpaid and didn't even get the whole package?! I'm glad I'm not an eBay stockholder.

With Joost not doing so great, maybe the Skype founders are angling to get it back while turning a huge profit.

2009-07-25

FaceBook Uses Your Pictures in Ads and How to Turn It Off

It seems a bit slimy, but FaceBook will use your pictures to push ads to your friends. It is understandable that they want to improve the efficacy of their ads, but goes beyond what s reasonably.

If you do not opt out of this "feature", your photos will appear in FaceBook ads hawking whatever product or service making it appear a bit like you recommended it to your friends.

Here's How you Can Turn Off Your Pictures in FaceBook Ads
To opt out of this "feature", go to "Settings" (top right, next to "Logout"), select "Privacy Settings", select "News Feeds and Wall", and select the "FaceBook Ads" tab. Set the "Appearance in FaceBook Ads" to "No One".


2009-05-31

Google Wave - Game Changer?

Google Wave is their new product aimed squarely at the recent surge in social sites and also at communications. At its best, it could be a new paradigm of communication tools allowing real time communication, collaboration, and sharing. On the other hand, it might be an attack on social media sites and their concentration of power and reach.

While e-mail and even instant messaging are similar in basic operation to plain paper mail, Google Wave could start to branch out into capabilities and functionalities beyond that. The popularity of tools like IM, SMS, and Twitter show that people crave a quick, real-time platform to communicate. But aside from social communications, many practical uses would require documents for collaboration and group effort which are awkward with these traditional methods of communication.

Wave provides an integrated metaphor to handle these traditional methods while adding additional functionality and automation. In addition to having lightweight apps and widgets, Wave allows "robots" that can interact with the wave in predetermined ways. Robots can provide additional content by referencing existing content or pulling from other services for integration.

The other aspect of Wave is that it is going to be open sourced and distributed. This could be a way to build interoperating systems that would vie with the existing social media giants such as FaceBook and Twitter. Being based on Jabber's open XMPP protocol and with Google's promise to open source the project, Wave servers could spring up across the Internet working together and tearing down the walled gardens that tend to concentrate users in a few closed systems.

If Google Wave works as advertised, it could allow users to communicate and collaborate with their own self-determined identities without locking that content and communication on a proprietary system. A successful Wave could end the domination of closed systems that tend to hold the content and relationships hostage. This would be bad for FaceBook and Twitter, not to mention MySpace (who mentions them anymore anyway).







Official Google Blog: Went Walkabout. Brought back Google Wave.

2009-05-16

Apple hires former OLPC security head to harden Mac OS X

Apple hires former OLPC security head to harden Mac OS X - Ars Technica

Most articles I've seen are focussed mostly or entirely on what this could mean for Mac OS X on the Mac platform, but I'm intrigued by the parallels with the iPhone/iPod version.

Currently, each app on the iPhone platform runs only with access to its own limited filesystem area with no access to other apps' data. This makes it difficult for apps to work together, but it dramatically reduces the potential impact of some kind of malware. The malware would be restricted to its own area, which does not allow too much mischief.

This is similar though nowhere near as sophisticated as Ivan Krstic's Bitfrost for OLPC. Under this system, each app is virtualized into a sandbox that only allows interactions that are explicitly allowed by the OS. This prevents an app from accessing hardware, software, or data that has not been explicitly allowed thus preventing any malware misbehavior.

While Mac OS X has always been in a much better position than Windows XP (based on smaller market share and underlying design), this hire signals an effort on Apple's part to really take security seriously. This addition could mean great things with the foundation they already have in place. Just as the geek-set have started to point out some of the glaring chinks in OS X's armor, Apple is moving to fix the problems.

Combining Bitfost-type functionality with the existing application signing infrastructure and Mach kernel features could allow Apple to extend and secure their security lead. And as Apple grows their market share in both computers and handhelds, this will continue to become more important. I'm looking forward to see how they implement a slick UI and make this easy yet still safe for users.



Links:





Hadoop Sorts a Petabyte in 16.25 Hours and a Terabyte in 62 Seconds

Hadoop Sorts a Petabyte in 16.25 Hours and a Terabyte in 62 Seconds (Hadoop and Distributed Computing at Yahoo!)

That is some fast sorting. Damn impressive.